WHO's emergency response framework: a case study for health emergency governance architecture

During COVID-19, attention was drawn to a lack offunctional governance frameworks for health emergencies. Routine governance structures were neither agile, nor flexible enough to operate with the speed required for urgent and coordinated action within complex and far-reaching responses. WHO’s Emergency Response Framework has significantly contributed to a stronger WHO response capacity in the European Region by providing accountabilities, responsibilities, delegation of authority, and rapid access to resources for response, while also allowing for participating members to be held accountable for their actions. We argue that now is the time to move health emergency management forwards by supporting States in strengthening their emergency governance architectures.

Drawing lessons on better governing for emergencies for improved resilience against health emergencies

The COVID-19 pandemic has taught us that preparednessfor and resilience against health emergencies is critical. To improve preparedness for health emergencies, the emergency preparedness and response governance architecture at all levels should be strengthened. It should be based on cross-cutting, whole-of-government, and whole-of-society approaches, moving away from siloed perspectives. Moreover, resilience against health emergencies should be based on universal health coverage and anchored in the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 core capacities implementation. Capacities and capabilities that are required to improve health services for national and global health security should also be strengthened.

London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games: public health surveillance and epidemiology.

Mass gatherings are regarded as potential risks for transmission of infectious diseases, and might compromise the health system of countries in which they are hosted. The evidence for increased transmission of infectious diseases at international sporting mass gatherings that attract many visitors from all over the world is not clear, and the evidence base for public health surveillance, epidemiology, and response at events such as the Olympics is small. However, infectious diseases are a recognised risk, and public health planning is, and should remain, a crucial part of the overall planning of sporting events. In this Series paper, we set out the planning and the surveillance systems that were used to monitor public health risks during the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games in the summer of 2012, and draw attention to the public health issues-infectious diseases and chemical, radiation, and environmental hazards-that arose. Although the absolute risk of health-protection problems, including infectious diseases, at sporting mass gatherings is small, the need for reassurance of the absence of problems is higher than has previously been considered; this could challenge conventional public health surveillance systems. Recognition of the limitations of health-surveillance systems needs to be part of the planning for future sporting events.

Euro 2012 European Football Championship Finals: planning for a health legacy.

The revised international health regulations offer a framework that can be used by host countries to organise public health activities for mass gatherings. From June 8, to July 1, 2012, Poland and Ukraine jointly hosted the Union of European Football Associations European Football Championship Finals (Euro 2012). More than 8 million people from around the world congregated to watch the games. Host countries and international public health agencies planned extensively to assess and build capacity in the host countries and to develop effective strategies for dissemination of public health messages. The effectiveness of public health services was maximised through rapid sharing of information between parties, early use of networks of experienced individuals, and the momentum of existing national health programmes. Organisers of future mass gatherings for sporting events should share best practice and their experiences through the WHO International Observer Program. Research about behaviour of large crowds is needed for crowd management and the evidence base translated into practice. A framework to measure and evaluate the legacy of Euro 2012 is needed based on the experiences and the medium-term and long-term benefits of the tournament.